Fuat Önen posted on November 14, 2022 08:02
The definition of a Kurd without Kurdistan The definition of a Kurdish problem without Kurdistan is pointless
You know, these popular movements in Iran, which have entered two months, have completely encompassed Persians, Azeris, Arabs, Balochs and Kurds. Now, how do you evaluate this development? How will this development in Iran affect the region? So is there a possibility that it will be limited to Iran? Could there be an intervention here?
First of all, Iran is not a whole. It is extremely wrong to consider Iran as a natural, normal, holistic country. Iran’s unity is an invading, force-based one. There is the reality of more than one nation and more than one country in the sovereignty area of the Iranian state.
The east of Kurdistan has been under the occupation of the Iranian State for centuries. Besides, there is Balochistan. Besides, there is Khuzestan. Besides, there is Azerbaijan. Therefore, it would be misleading to consider Iran as a whole. Because when we consider Iran as a whole, we will turn the rebellion there into a single color. In other words, the rally in Tehran and the rally in Mahabat and the rally in Sinine do not have the same interior. The facts of these different countries should also be handled correctly.
There is a historical affinity between Balochistan and Kurdistan in the domain of the Iranian state’s sovereignty. And there is neither an enmity towards the Kurds among the Balochs, nor an enmity against the Balochs among the Kurds. It should be noted that Balochistan and Kurdistan are the places where the most casualties are incurred. Khuzestan is a predominantly Arab country.
As you know, Khuzestan Iraq was one of the main reasons for the Iran war. and in 1975 it was handed over to Iran by Sadam Hussein to suppress the uprising in the south of Kurdistan. 1979 While Iran was in turmoil, Saddam took advantage of this and took Khuzestan back again. After nine decades and the death of hundreds of thousands of people, Khuzestan was left to Iran again.
There is an Azerbaijan as a continuation of Soviet Azerbaijan. There have been land disputes between Azerbaijan and Kurdistan since 1946. Most of the regions that we consider the eastern part of Kurdistan, especially Urmia and its surroundings, are considered by Azerbaijani politicians as Azerbaijan. Let me even say this. When the Republic of Kurdistan was proclaimed in 1946, they said that Azerbaijan and Soviet Azerbaijan should not be declared as a separate autonomous republic by the President Bagurov and demanded that the Republic of Kurdistan be designed as an autonomous region within the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic. Kurdistan politicians denied this
This is general information for you. In my opinion, there are hardly any serious national problems to be resolved within Iran’s integrity. Solving the huge problems there is possible by narrowing the sovereignty area of the Iranian state. In other words, as long as the Iranian state does not withdraw from outside the places we can call Acemistan, it is not possible to reach a permanent solution there, as long as they treat the Kurds, the Balochians, the Arabs in Khuzestan, the Azeris as a part of the Iranian nation and maintain this invading structure.
In particular, the Kurdistan issue is not an issue that can be resolved within Iran, Turkey, Iraq or Syria. The solution of the Kurdistan issue is possible with the elimination of these artificial and occupying state borders. I think we should approach the uprisings in eastern Kurdistan from this perspective.
The murder of Jina Emini, which was instrumental in these latest popular uprisings, should not mislead us. Especially the uprising in Eastern Kurdistan should not be considered as a revolt only for women’s rights at work. When we look at the slogans chanted in the demonstrations there, we can show this much more clearly. The issue is very serious, they found a very beautiful slogan and they were chanting slogans like “hetta Kurdek bimine Kurdistane bimine” in Kurdish. There was such a banner. In other words, he will stay in Kurdistan until there is only one Kurdish left in the world. If you want to eliminate Kurdistan, if you are eliminating the reality of Kurdistan, you must eliminate all Kurds. means. Kurdistan will remain until there is only one Kurdish left.
This is important in this respect. The definition of a Kurd without Kurdistan The definition of a Kurdish problem without Kurdistan is empty. Because you cannot define Kurds without Kurdistan. This is especially true for Northern Kurdistan. Turkish state’s sovereignty
Let’s say you can describe Turks, Pomaks, Chechens without a country truth. Because you point to where they came from. So, you can say that the Chechens came from Chechnya. You say the Pomaks came from Bulgaria, you say the Albanians came from Albania, and you can define them without the country truth. But when it comes to Kurds, it is not possible to define a Kurd without a Kurdistan.
Because you have to say that these are off the ground. So for him, if Kurdistan in the world The territory we call distan will remain in Kurdistan until there is only one Kurdish left. I think this slogan is very important in this respect.
After the murder of Jina Emini, although it initially started only as a reaction to the headscarf, turban or veiling, it gradually gained a political meaning and this has now turned into a national rebellion, especially in Kurdistan.
Therefore, it is necessary to approach the reporters there with this awareness. In other words, it should not be considered as a resistance against the democratization of the Iranian state or the Iranian state’s forcing women to wear hijab.
Let me put it this way, Iran will not take such a step today. But today Iran said that we no longer force women to wear hijab. Will the Kurdistan issue be resolved or will the Balochistan issue be resolved? Will the problems of working people be solved there? No, it will not be resolved. Therefore, one should not be deceived by appearances and make appearances in theory. It is necessary to explain this appearance with theory.
Comments are closed.